Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane.
- Anthony Mostert turned to the courts on an pressing foundation in January 2019 in an strive to interdict the Public Protector from releasing her findings on an investigation implicating him.
- The Public Protector’s investigation followed a criticism by Financial Freedom Fighters president Julius Malema.
- Malema alleged that, following his appointment as a curator to administer pension funds on the Financial Services Board, Mostert paid himself in excess of R188 million in curator bills.
The Gauteng Division of the High Court docket in Pretoria has brushed aside, with prices, criminal expert Anthony Mostert’s utility for toddle away to charm the court docket’s earlier decision by which it granted prices in favour of the Public Protector in a subject Mostert brought against the government middle on an pressing foundation in 2019.
The announcement became once made by the Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s place of work on Sunday.
Per the Public Protector’s spokesperson Oupa Segalwe, acting Opt Brad Wanless acknowledged: “This court docket is of the concept that there will not be always any cheap prospect that an charm would be winning. Following thereon, this utility for toddle away to charm must be brushed aside, with prices.”
The judgment became once dated 13 May possibly possibly simply 2020, nonetheless became once issued to the parties on Friday, acknowledged Segalwe.
The Public Protector served Mostert with a gape through portion 7(9)(a) of the Public Protector Act in November 2018 one day of an investigation into alleged maladministration and abuse of energy by dilapidated government officer of the Financial Services Board (FSB), imply D.P. Tshidi.
The investigation followed a criticism by Financial Freedom Fighters president Julius Malema.
Malema alleged that, in his advice for the appointment of curators to administer FSB pensions funds, Tshidi had acted improperly in that he favoured Mostert.
Data24 reported that Malema alleged that Tshidi appointed Mostert because the curator of loads of pension funds that had fallen sufferer to a fraudulent plot, identified because the Ghavalas plot.
Per Segalwe, Malema alleged that, following his appointment as a curator, Mostert unduly paid himself in excess of R188 million in curator bills.
Malema extra alleged that Tshidi abused his energy in that he threatened and bullied loads of financial institutions into withdrawing civil motion against Mostert, allegedly threatening to withdraw their working licenses, acknowledged Segalwe.
Mostert turned to the courts on an pressing foundation in January 2019 in an strive to interdict the Public Protector from releasing her findings on the subject.
Segalwe added: “He sought this reduction pending the utility he supposed to file in court docket to admire the Public Protector’s decision to investigate conduct absorbing him reviewed and situation aside on, among diverse grounds, that the government middle did no longer revel in jurisdiction over him.
“His utility became once unsuccessful, with the court docket granting prices against him in December 2019.
“He became once ordered to foot the bill in his deepest skill, on the scale of criminal expert and client. On 6 March 2020, he sought to charm that call to a elephantine court docket. The court docket heard his utility for toddle away to charm later that month.”
Following its consideration of the facts and the appropriate regulation, the court docket brushed aside his utility for toddle away to charm, ordering him to pay the Public Protector and one other celebration’s prices in his deepest skill, acknowledged Segalwe.
– Compiled by Maibongwe Dayimani