There might be an endless distinction within the prices of ventilators bought underneath the PM Cares Fund, while two of the businesses to whom an advance modified into launched had been later now not instructed by the technical committee constituted underneath DGHS. These were revealed in an RTI response regarding the procurement of crucial medical equipment with funds allocated during the PM Cares Fund.
The RTI has moreover revealed that on the very least one such take narrate modified into given with out the nod of the empowered neighborhood constituted to make certain availability of crucial medical equipment, because it pre-dates the constitution of the neighborhood.
On June 18, 2020, RTI activist Anjali Bhardwaj had sought data regarding the details of hospitals trip by the Centre which were allocated money or were supplied ventilators paid for during the PM Cares Fund, alongside side the names of the hospitals. She moreover sought to clutch the total amount allocated from PM Cares Fund, total various of ventilators supplied and the assorted of ventilators which were delivered and paid for by the Fund.
The Ministry of Health and Household Welfare in a response dated July 20, 2020, acknowledged, “250 PM-Cares ventilators got to DRDO COVID Clinical institution in Delhi and three were offered to the All India Institute of Ayurveda, Delhi. No funds are being offered to hospitals for take of ventilators.”
The ministry moreover acknowledged, “The Ministry and HLL had made take orders for 58,850 ‘Fabricate in India’ ventilators. PM Cares is proving Rs 2,000 crore for the acquisition of Fabricate in India ventilators.” It gives the title of the businesses, the acquisition narrate amount and the acquisition narrate designate. The reply extra notes that the technical committee constituted underneath DGHS instructed handiest 3 of the 6 companies. It in a roundabout design notes that 17,100 ventilators were allocated to states/UTs.
On the opposite hand, a reading of the desk containing the names of the businesses, the acquisition narrate amount and the acquisition narrate designate offered within the RTI response relate huge variation within the designate of ventilators. As an illustration, as per the desk, every ventilator from ‘Allied Clinical’ company charges Rs 8.62 lakh, while these from ‘Agva Healthcare’ company payment Rs 1.66 lakh every.
“The details of the 17,100 ventilators allocated to the states and UTs, during the names of the hospitals to which these had been allocated, the assorted of ventilators allocated and heaps others might per chance well now not be positioned within the public arena,” acknowledged RTI activist Bhardwaj.
In one other RTI filed on June 18, 2020, Bhardwaj requested a duplicate of correspondence whereby the views of the Department of Health and Household Welfare had been sought on the provide of ventilators from the PM Cares Fund.
In response, a duplicate of the dialog between the Top Minister’s Assign of job (PMO) and the Health Ministry modified into offered. It modified into a letter dated Would per chance perchance moreover simply 18, 2020 from Bhaskar Khulbe (adviser to the Top Minister), written to Secretary, MoHFW and a reply from Secretary, MoHFW dated Would per chance perchance moreover simply 20, 2020. The letter from Khulbe famed that the Health Ministry has already initiated the technique of procurement of ventilators in accordance to the concepts of the empowered neighborhood constituted and requests an intensive proposal in narrate that 50,000 ventilators will also be financed during the PM Cares Fund.
It talked about that your complete administrative technique of take and deployment of these ventilators will be done by the ministry as per executive norms of procurement. It moreover talked about that manufacturers must be suggested that the ventilators raise a obvious identity showing that they’ve been supplied from PM Cares fund and are moreover embedded with a GPS instrument. The response from the ministry offered an intensive affirm containing the names of the businesses, the acquisition narrate amount, the acquisition narrate designate and the advance launched. It extra famed that the acquisition narrate of Rs 166 crore to an organization modified into given earlier than the constitution of the empowered neighborhood.
The desk containing the names of the businesses, the acquisition narrate amount and the acquisition narrate designate relate a huge disparity within the pricing of ventilators. At the least one take narrate modified into given with out the nod of the empowered neighborhood because it pre-dated the constitution of the neighborhood. “This RTI response shows that on the very least two of the businesses — Jyoti CNV Automation & AMTZ Frequent — to whom an advance modified into launched and had been later now not instructed by the technical committee constituted underneath the DGHS,” Bhardwaj acknowledged.
As PM Narendra Modi announced the open of the Top Minister’s Citizen Assistance and Relief in Emergency Eventualities Fund, or PM CARES, the announcement modified into met with immediate criticism. Congress president Sonia Gandhi questioned the resolution to set a original body when there modified into already a reduction fund within the rating of the Top Minister’s Nationwide Relief Fund (PMNRF).
There were demands since then for transferring the money composed within the PM Cares Fund to the PMNRF. Petitions had been filed within the Supreme Court after the manager did now not factor in these objections.
Now, the Supreme Court has brushed apart a petition seeking switch of funds or merger of the PM Cares Fund with the PMNRF. This ruling formally upholds the separate identity of the PM Cares Fund. The Supreme Court has dominated that the central executive has the freedom to advance to a resolution the financial measures to be adopted to handle Covid-19 pandemic.
Does PM Cares require audit by the Comptroller & Auditor Frequent of India (CAG)?
Because it is a public charitable belief with voluntary donations and does now not receive any executive make stronger, no CAG audit is required, the Supreme Court has dominated.
In case of NDRF, the pointers issued by the central executive as per DM Act particularly present for audit of the NDRF by CAG.